What TNA should have done

[uhsumdumboy]

During the Monday night Impact battle against RAW when Hogan debuted, and TNA got roughly 3 million viewers (compared to RAW's Bret Hart return 5 million) I think they should have debuted Hogan as well as announced the debut of another big name for next weeks show. Could you imagine if Hogan debuted and they're like oh yeah, and tune in next week for the debut of RVD. Those people that tuned in to see Hogan would arguably tune in next week. And then after RVD TNA announced another big name, this could happen an entire month. They say that people develop a habit in 22 days. If Every person who tuned in just to see the debut of a big name by the end of the month they'd be a habitual TNA viewer. 2 thirds of that 3 million would most probably be a TNA fan for life.

 

[AKI Man]

Good point. However, if they wanted to keep getting good ratings, they would have to debut a big name every week! and there are only so many wrestlers free to join. That is not the solution to there problem. There problem is Hogan and Bishoff running and producing the show, and wasting time on washed up has beens that they continue to push in the main event scene, though I will say I like the fortune U-turn on immortal. They are TNA originals and deserve the spotlight. Hogan is the cancer in TNA.

 

[Christian]

Actually the biggest problem is that Bischoff and Hogan are too much on TV (backstage etc etc)
They should have matches instead of that.
Than TNA would be better.