WWE.com drops story line too soon.

Tired

Legend
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
4,768
Reaction score
0
A story line which started on WWE.com has officially been dropped, even though it can now officially reach a natural conclusion.

Five weeks ago, the website ran an article wondering which one of three new stars would lose a match first. The three candidates were Brodus Clay, Ryback and Tensai.

All three men had actually debuted in the WWE before this year, and all three made returns in recent months. And all three went on long winning streaks.

Clay was the first man to lose, suffering defeat at the hands of Big Show two weeks ago on RAW. Clay had competed mostly against mid-carders and enhancement talent, squashing all of them. But it should be pointed out that Clay's streak lasted since the first RAW of the year on January 2nd.

Tensai suffered his first fall on the last episode of Raw. Since returning the night after WrestleMania, he has been squashing enhancement talent, but has had occasional matches against main eventers including John Cena. Cena would be the man to end his streak.

Ryback is still undefeated. WWE programming and WWE.com are still pushing Ryback's streak. They focus mainly on the fact that most of Ryback's matches have been handicap matches, which he has won very quickly. But it should also be noted that many of his matches were against unsigned talent, which NEVER beat WWE contracted stars at WWE events.
 

TheDoctor

Legend
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
6,073
Reaction score
0
I don't remember Brodus getting pinned? I was under the impression it was a no contest cause Show just beat the crap out of everyone. I did think the match even officially started.
 

Tired

Legend
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
4,768
Reaction score
0
According to the RAW results, it was recorded as a loss. But then again, WWE does get its info about itself wrong from time to time.
 

KG 24

Main Eventer
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
1,579
Reaction score
0
RagNaRoc said:
According to the RAW results, it was recorded as a loss. But then again, WWE does get its info about itself wrong from time to time.
A lot, actually.
 

Tired

Legend
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
4,768
Reaction score
0
kg24nmfan said:
RagNaRoc said:
According to the RAW results, it was recorded as a loss. But then again, WWE does get its info about itself wrong from time to time.
A lot, actually.
Agreed.
 
Top