@ maximo : That's the most interesting question I've seen, since it is one no one has discussed a billion times. I think if Chyna had been taken a lot more seriously, we wouldn't need "Total Divas" to create a rise in female viewers.
I think Chyna should have been forced to polish up her style a bit, and then given a legitimate IC reign, instead of her flash in the pan run that she got. I think that the mid 90's to the mid 2000's were some of the biggest steps back for women in wrestling. Bra and panties matches were a joke. If I want to watch porn, I'll watch porn.
It hasn't been until WWE went Pg and were forced to actually focus more on the in-ring ability of their Diva's Division have we seen the quality rise consistently with the women's division. There's more than 3 or four women that can go, now. Even when Lita, Trish, Jazz and Victoria were having their heyday, they were still shadowed much of the time due to some talent-less woman getting the title due to her having a playboy spread.
So yeah, if Chyna was taken more seriously, so would have the women's division, but instead, we got nearly ten years of "PUPPIES!" and piss-poor strip-teases. I'm a god-damn wrestling fan. I don't need WWE to objectify women for me, I need them to present to me a compelling roster of wrestlers.
Paige vs Emma at Arrival was fantastic, nearly stole the show, and if Chyna had been given a legitimate run, those kind of women's matches would have been on PPV years before they finally did.